<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Track 7 - Community Engagement, Mass Communication, and Educational Initiatives for Social Wellbeing and a Plastic-Free Society</title>
<link>http://repository.ou.ac.lk/handle/123456789/4267</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 16:14:30 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-10-09T16:14:30Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Closing the Implementation Gap: A Roadmap for Extended Producer Responsibility for Plastics in Sri Lanka through Lessons from the European Union</title>
<link>http://repository.ou.ac.lk/handle/123456789/4339</link>
<description>Closing the Implementation Gap: A Roadmap for Extended Producer Responsibility for Plastics in Sri Lanka through Lessons from the European Union
Thathsarani, A.A.D.N.; Jayawardena, U.A.; Manoj, W.D.
Extended Producer Responsibility&#13;
(EPR) has emerged as an important regulatory&#13;
approach for shifting responsibility for products&#13;
and their post-consumer impacts towards&#13;
producers. However, the rapid expansion of crossborder direct-to-consumer (D2C) e-commerce&#13;
creates regulatory challenges for EPR systems that&#13;
have traditionally relied on domestic&#13;
manufacturers, importers and distributors as&#13;
identifiable responsible actors. The article discusses&#13;
whether Sri Lanka's EPR framework is sufficient to&#13;
rule out the gaps in plastic products and packaging&#13;
supplied directly to Sri Lankan consumers by&#13;
foreign producers through distant online selling&#13;
platforms. Particular attention is given to section&#13;
23QQ of the National Environmental Act,&#13;
introduced by the National Environmental&#13;
(Amendment) Act, No 15 of 2026, and to the&#13;
potential regulatory difficulties arising where a&#13;
foreign producer has no importer, distributor or&#13;
authorised representative in Sri Lanka. The article&#13;
adopts a comparative legal research methodology,&#13;
examining relevant Sri Lankan legislation and&#13;
policy against selected European Union (EU)&#13;
approaches to producer responsibility, distance&#13;
selling, packaging and online commerce. There is a&#13;
regulatory gap concerning the attribution,&#13;
registration, monitoring and enforcement of EPR&#13;
obligations in cross-border D2C transactions. EU&#13;
law provides a useful comparative reference&#13;
because its regulatory framework expressly&#13;
addresses distance selling and, under the Packaging&#13;
and Packaging Waste Regulation (EU) 2025/40,&#13;
extends regulatory attention to producers supplying&#13;
packaging and packaged products through distance&#13;
contracts and to online platforms facilitating such&#13;
transactions. The article proposes a Sri Lankan&#13;
framework based on recognition of foreign&#13;
distance-selling producers, authorised local&#13;
representation, digital EPR registration, online&#13;
marketplace due diligence, traceability and&#13;
coordination between environmental authorities&#13;
and Customs. Consumer responsibility should&#13;
operate as a complementary component of EPR&#13;
rather than as a substitute for producer&#13;
responsibility. The article argues that a legally&#13;
defined and digitally traceable framework could&#13;
strengthen accountability for plastics entering Sri&#13;
Lanka through cross-border e-commerce and&#13;
contribute to more effective post-consumer plastic&#13;
management and circular-economy objectives.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repository.ou.ac.lk/handle/123456789/4339</guid>
<dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>From Likes to Lifestyle: Exploring the Gap Between Online Environmental Advocacy and  Offline Sustainable Practices</title>
<link>http://repository.ou.ac.lk/handle/123456789/4278</link>
<description>From Likes to Lifestyle: Exploring the Gap Between Online Environmental Advocacy and  Offline Sustainable Practices
Sana, Naz; Dissanayake, M. P; Hewagamage, K. P.
Digital platforms are considered influential&#13;
for advocacy, awareness, and collective action on&#13;
environmental issues through hashtags and online&#13;
campaigns. However, in everyday life, this digital&#13;
environmental activism does not always translate into&#13;
environmentally responsible behavior. This discrepancy&#13;
raises an important question: why do people endorse&#13;
environmental causes online but struggle to adopt&#13;
sustainable habits offline? To explore this, the study&#13;
adopted an integrative review methodology to synthesize&#13;
existing evidence on sustainable behavior change in&#13;
everyday life initiated by digital campaigns and&#13;
engagement on global environmental issues such as&#13;
plastic pollution, water conservation, recycling,&#13;
sustainable consumption, and biodiversity protection. To&#13;
capture multidisciplinary evidence, literature was&#13;
searched from 2015 to 2026 across The Directory of Open&#13;
Access Journals (DOAJ), Google Scholar, Semantic&#13;
Scholars, and other publicly available and published&#13;
policy reports on the portals of national ministries and&#13;
UN agencies. A thematic synthesis grounded in moral&#13;
licensing and the theory of planned behavior was&#13;
conducted to study what psychological and social factors&#13;
contribute to the gap between online advocacy and offline&#13;
behavior. Our findings are discussed in three interrelated&#13;
themes to study this disconnect: a) convenience over&#13;
commitment, b) digital participation in environmental&#13;
campaigns as symbolic participation, and c) can&#13;
awareness alone change behavior? The study suggested&#13;
the significance of moving beyond awareness-driven&#13;
campaigns towards behavior-change communication&#13;
(BCC), as online environmental activism may foster&#13;
awareness and symbolic engagement temporarily; yet, to&#13;
translate the initiatives into meaningful and sustainable&#13;
ways, the review proposed that a BCC-informed LIFE&#13;
pathway may help future empirical evidence to study how&#13;
digital environmental activism embedded with BCC&#13;
principles can support persistent behavioral change in&#13;
real-life settings.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repository.ou.ac.lk/handle/123456789/4278</guid>
<dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nexus between Indigenous Knowledge and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review</title>
<link>http://repository.ou.ac.lk/handle/123456789/4277</link>
<description>Nexus between Indigenous Knowledge and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review
Marasinghe, M. M. I. K.; Kaushalya, V. G. S.; Abeysekera, K. H. T.
The study reviews current state of knowledge&#13;
and empirical research gaps on indigenous knowledge&#13;
and environmental sustainability. The study followed&#13;
Systematic Literature Review based on Preferred&#13;
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-&#13;
Analyses (PRISMA). The review considered 173 articles&#13;
relevant to South Asian region published during the&#13;
period from 2015-2025 extracted from LENS.ORG, a free&#13;
database. Bibliometric analysis using VOSViewer&#13;
software, and thematic analysis were performed. The&#13;
review identified 03 key themes 1) Conservation, Ecology&#13;
and Sustainability of Ecosystems, 2) Ethnobotany,&#13;
Indigenous Knowledge and Sustainable Development and&#13;
3) Climate Change and Adaptation through Local&#13;
Knowledge Systems. The findings revealed that the&#13;
empirical studies are lacking in the areas of conservation,&#13;
ecology, adaptation and the studies connecting the&#13;
biodiversity and indigenous knowledge.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repository.ou.ac.lk/handle/123456789/4277</guid>
<dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
